Good morning. The Green party of England and Wales is in turmoil. Following a vote to adopt a policy that equates Zionism with racism , and calls for Israel to be replaced by a single Palestinian state “with equal rights for all”, some Jewish members say they are considering whether they are welcome in the party.
While Green members celebrated, or mourned, the motion passing, some have questioned its purpose, arguing it will distract from what’s important – keeping eyes on Gaza and holding the Israeli government to account – instead igniting a divisive discussion about ideology that will only harm the party. Today, I spoke to Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland, to understand how the vote has been received by many Jewish people beyond the Greens, and senior political correspondent Peter Walker, who reported on the fallout of the vote at the party conference in Brighton at the weekend. That’s after the headlines ...
Five big stories RAF Fairford | No 10 has insisted the Gloucestershire base is secure a day after the US air force suddenly withdrew a dozen B-1 bombers that had been stationed there amid security concerns about a possible threat from Iran. Donald Trump | Donald Trump’s approval ratings reached a record low on Monday, according to new opinion polls. A new Reuters/Ipsos poll shows Trump’s approval rating at a record-low 32%.
Brazilian elections | Flávio Bolsonaro, the son of imprisoned former president Jair Bolsonaro, is poised to win the Brazilian presidency , after a shock first-round victory. Jeffrey Archer | Jeffrey Archer , the bestselling author and former MP whose political career ended in disgrace when he was imprisoned for perjury, has died at the age of 86. Cancer | Cases of seven types of cancer have risen sharply among younger people in England , major new research has found, prompting warnings that lifestyle choices are costing thousands of lives each year.
In depth: Why the Greens are divided over Zionism Green party leader Zack Polanski faces questions over the Greens’ new position on Zionism. Photograph: Aldo Ciarrocchi/Alamy Yesterday, the head of the Jewish Greens Vivien Lichtenstein confirmed that she is considering leaving the party after Sunday’s vote. Many other Jewish Greens – a significant majority of whom described themselves as anti-Zionists when polled – are similarly taking stock.
Much of the fallout was predictable. The chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, described the motion as “poisonous antisemitism” and Israel immediately barred Zack Polanski, the Green party’s Jewish leader, from entering the country. The Israeli foreign ministry denounced the motion as “a stain on the history of the United Kingdom”.
With four of the Green’s five MPs opposing the new policy, yesterday evening the group representing European Green parties expressed dismay at the move which runs counter to their support for a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. There is now growing anger internally with Polanski, who avoided the debate to campaign in the Holborn and St Pancras byelection, where he is running for former prime minister Keir Starmer’s seat. What is the motion about – and who supports it?
Zionism isn’t a clearly defined, singular ideology. Broadly speaking, it means support for Jewish self-determination, realised today in the state of Israel. The motion argues that Zionism is racist because it “privileges one ethnic group on the basis of the subjugation of others” and that in Israel this is based upon “European settler-colonial systems of domination and oppression”.
It adds: “This motion is aimed at the political ideology and practice of Zionism ... and not at the religious or ethnic background of those who may identify as Zionists”. Prior to this, senior Greens have been some of the most vehement voices in the UK in condemning Israel’s destruction of Gaza, which a UN commission of inquiry found to be a genocide. They have also spoken out against the ongoing occupation of the West Bank, as well as pushing for a full arms and trade embargo.
The motion was put forward by Greens for Palestine, an internal pressure group that calls for the creation of a single Palestinian state, in which Jews and Palestinians can freely live. There is clearly broad support for this general principle – the motion passed by 1,022 votes to 813. One of the sponsors, Kieran Andrieu, a British Palestinian, described it as a “unifying motion”, arguing there was “enormous virtue” in naming what he said was a “damaging ideology”.
During the debate, he added, “everyone was agreeing that we need to disagree agreeably”. The vote happened behind closed doors, but longstanding Green supporters have shared with Peter their concerns that the motion was being pushed by relatively new members. Greens for Palestine have been very open about encouraging people to join the party to support this single issue.
The reaction A legal case against the new policy is highly likely – some Green members are already consulting lawyers over whether the party could be challenged for breaching equalities legislation. Barrister Adam Wagner KC, who led a case that decided Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party broke equalities laws over antisemitism, told Peter he believed such a case would have a good chance of success. There is huge frustration, particularly from longer established members, at what they consider a lack of leadership from Polanski.
First, in trying to cancel the conference to free up his supporters to campaign for him, and second for missing the debate on a hugely divisive matter. Other senior party figures, such as the former co-leader Carla Denyer, have voiced concern that the motion draws attention away from what’s important. “I’m concerned that elected Greens will be forced to spend our time and energy debating and defending definitions, at the expense of focusing on the essential actions that only we can take to make things materially better for people in Palestine,” Denyer said in a statement on X.
Polanski has said he agrees that Zionism, when defined as “the displacement and genocide of the Palestinian people”, does “clearly” constitute racism. Critics say he could have supported what was regarded as a “safeguarding” amendment, which offered reassurance that members would not be disciplined for their membership of Jewish organisations with Zionist affiliations, even synagogues – as the amendment did not garner enough support to pass. This is a now a “genuine fear” among some Jewish members, Peter tells me.
Greens for Palestine have consistently stated this was not its intention, emphasising that the policy refers to Zionism as a political ideology, supporting the state of Israel which they believe relies on apartheid and racism to uphold a majority Jewish population. “But as the Jewish Greens pointed out, Zionism can mean so many different things,” said Peter. A Palestinian in the West Bank or Gaza, a left-leaning kibbutznick and a Netanyahu supporter will each have different interpretations.
“Many now worry that this enshrines a definition of Zionism that only reflects an extreme, right wing version of it.” What is Zionism, and who identifies with it? “To brand everyone under that one umbrella as a racist shows a deep ignorance of what the word Zionism means and the sheer range of people who identify with it,” is the point Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland made ahead of the Green conference vote. When we spoke yesterday, he told me that the motion’s success marked “a shift in the Overton window” that has left many people well beyond Green party activists alarmed: “A mainstream political party has adopted a position, which functionally identifies most British Jews as racists,” he suggests.
Jonathan references the celebrated Israeli writer and peace activist Amos Oz, who described Zionism as a ‘family name’. “‘Zionist’ alone doesn’t tell you much. You need to have a first name to make sense of it: whether that’s socialist Zionism, Marxist-Zionism, religious Zionism or cultural Zionism,” he says.
There are non-Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews, too. Many of those Jewish activists defending Palestinians from settler violence on the West Bank, he explains, would describe themselves as Zionists – just as extremist settlers would. For many British Jews – nearly two-thirds of whom identify as Zionist according to a report by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research published on Monday – this is not about support for Israeli government policy, current or past.
“For many Jews, when you use the term Zionism rather than Israel, you’re in the realm of a dream or an aspiration; one that is a constitutive part of the Jewish identity,” he says. It’s an outlook informed by generations of persecution, which is one reason why the comparison to ‘settler-colonialism’ that the Green motion makes is anathema to so many, he adds. The mood is also reflected in the research, which also found British Jews have become more likely to identify as Zionist, consider emigrating to Israel, or feel a close attachment to the country since the 7 October attacks.
Meanwhile, younger Jewish people, aged sixteen- to 29-year-olds were less likely to say Israel was “very important” to their identity, with the percentage falling by one point – to 27% – in 2024. This aligns with some Jewish commentators who argue there is a generational shift in the Jewish diaspora, with those younger people appalled by Israel’s actions in Gaza identifying less as Zionist than their parents’ generation. What could it mean for the Greens?
Most close observers believe that the Zionism motion is unlikely to make a difference to the outcome of Thursday’s byelection: Labour are very confident of transforming Starmer’s base and Burnham’s bounce into a win, while Polanksi himself has rolled the pitch in advance, saying it’s a 50/50 outcome that won’t impact his authority as leader. skip past newsletter promotion after newsletter promotion The longer term problem for the party, Peter argues, is that this one policy dispute overshadows all others, and might even cap Green support at a point when the party was on the cusp of an electoral breakthrough. “On Sunday, after the Zionism vote, they announced a series of key economic policies that no one paid any attention to. This is all they’re going to be able to talk about, maybe up to the next election, and voters don’t like parties that look like they are mired in chaos,” he says.
What else we’ve been enjoying Abdiqadir Salah who was injured in a US drone strike. Photograph: Mohamed Gabobe Here’s a stunning story about Abdiqadir Salah , a seven-year-old Somali boy who was severely injured in a US drone strike at the centre of a Guardian investigation – and the Guardian readers who funded his life-changing surgery. Charlie Lindlar, newsletters team I love cheese, and I love Giuseppe Nucci’s photo essay about the rebel cheesemakers in Italy’s Orobie Alps who, at significant human cost, are keeping a tradition alive at a time when agricultural industrialisation and the climate crisis threatens its survival.
Craille Maguire Gillies, newsletters team In this beautiful piece , Katharine Gammon profiles some of the many animals, from cougars to lizards, that call the Hollywood sign home. Charlie Anyone interested in the energised Celtic alliance ought to check out a piece about another place putting sovereignty on the political table (again). Caitlin Walsh Miller’s profile for the Walrus about Quebec’s “ géneration oui ”, the young campaigners waving the separatist flag in Canada, is a fascinating look at a culture and generation at an inflection point.
Craille Tom Cruise and Alejandro G Iñárritu’s Digger is on its way to becoming a $150m box office bomb – but could it be a “misunderstood masterpiece”? Sian Cain makes the case . Charlie Sport A spectator is injured after Daniil Medvedev hit a ball into the crowd during his semi-final match against Novak Djokovic at the China Open.
Photograph: Tingshu Wang/Reuters Tennis | Daniil Medvedev was disqualified from his China Open semi-final with Novak Djokovic on Monday after hitting a rebounding ball into the crowd that struck a spectator in the eye. Cricket | The International Cricket Council (ICC) will not introduce a World Club Championship or more international multilateral tournaments until 2031 at the earliest because of resistance from England, Australia and India. Football | Michael Olise came off the bench to inspire France to a 4-1 win over Belgium in the Nations League, handing Zinedine Zidane his first home victory since taking charge.
The front pages Photograph: Guardian “Sharp rise in under-50s cancers a ticking timebomb, say experts” is the lead story on the Guardian on Tuesday. “Kemi: Britain needs an ‘iron dome’ to keep us safe,” says the Express , while the i paper has “Badenoch promises ‘Britannia Dome’ to protect the UK from missile attack.” Meanwhile, the Star has: “The Iron Lady.” “King tells Andrew: I won’t fund court fight,” is the splash over at the Telegraph. “King: Don’t use my money,” has the Mirror .
The top story at the Times is “PM looks to push back decision on defence cash,” while the FT runs with: “Sainsbury’s held talks with Morrisons on forging new industry powerhouse.” Finally, the Metro with: “Predators stalking our unis.” Today in Focus: The Latest Photograph: Guardian Why did the US rush to withdraw bombers from UK airbase? The US withdrew its bombers from RAF Fairford after an investigation into an alleged planned terrorist attack on the base. At least 10 B-1 bombers used by the US military in the Iran conflict flew out of Fairford on Sunday, suggesting US officials were taking the threat seriously.
Lucy Hough speaks to Dan Sabbagh , the Guardian’s defence and security editor. Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings Illustration: Ben Jennings/The Guardian The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad Ruff night? Breathable linen sheets could make bedtime more comfortable, according to The Filter.
Photograph: Evgeniya Pavlova/Getty Images Our Filter team asked Guardian readers to share the everyday products that have improved their lives. Popular recommendations included linen sheets for better sleep, especially during menopause. Other practical favourites included wrist wraps for weightlifting, and changing robes for all-weather walks.
Gardeners recommended shredders for turning garden waste into useful mulch. In the kitchen, readers highlighted Danish dough whisks, egg cookers, and Jennie loved her jar-opening key: “No more RSI. Every home should have one.” Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work?
And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
Source: The Guardian
World Stock Push



